CO129-493 - Governor Sir Clementi - 1926 [6-8] — Page 443

.1900

-

2

-

440

afroï ofidut to rotostiα .no⠀

VIɑdete? ant od sonstater dol¥

1 pcer, lingk dtël odt betah dotaged Leijuskiino)

-invol[o? an ŠTOGOT

Sof a worî moitsoflyge na to divser aút al

treďof wit to faded no Osei ni píïse arsenigas to 000,008 Juoda to sata na semiozug of 100 qidamedƐ esen beteblanco saw #1 ‚ISE Jo] entzell to tree Jool

to Jasuqolevab edt tol samion evianadiang3100 # eisqorq PUBG YTIBUÇ Ot ISE tod ani'tak moti gaihastre stodaetot sic Noida fost pusaibro na tot asbiyorg beatvab amerio a wit."A" asiq no mwoda as noitisoq adi ni tlaki biswrDB Jostorq ed of her bas nword beruoloo mwoda noijamaloer WIit ot yu frizuord bensom eiddur a no bebawol Ilaw you s ed of egziltred,aebiT gatıqë vranibrů to retail mal to it of lellaraq nəyisdr oderonoo boorotater yd FebivorĘ Corointer yď nerig gaied noltemloer ent of saecos,ILow Kimisqa bas trage aleviotai is beoalq syangnag steroNCO OL: it al .noitœsider bas tradw oft neested constulb lovers tact at a easdowq of bahnstis aew moitsoliqqa edi vauld gridɔubnoo urti? adft „Jeet exaupa 000,008 Juoda vid Jaceda Ildmu ‡naturtevol molai jon bil naoljaidoyen chiermetƐ tailoC tredok oni 、ata-ilɔ tisdð tædt alas to zvijaluosqa sobiq zieńt ai teit has "duo beqqoʻrb" had bez maze schi jaimialoer no Jnaðal stew erobikud emaniɗü Di Jassenet dewid to moitovitando add to? di gaiqoleveb

TODA WHİTEI” as sword won aasta deodt to eles entrevewol

BILJ „Vistaaution,leyslab ad ton bivoo "Išà à GED.00M sw waastot oala odvynz neotɑ ahui „îl saw tomadoʻruq yaiqqide toi stia . yaigolavob to ytlíkinaoq

At this stage of the proceedings, the advice of Messrs. Coode, liatthews, Fitzmaurice and Wilson, Consulting Engineers on the improvement of the harbour, was obtained with reference to the proposed scheme of development at North Point. Their report was forwarded on the 7th October

1922.

Referring to this report (para.16), it would appea that whilst they are not in favour of the development of the

site for deep water berths, they consider such a scheme is practicable.

Their objections to the scheme being:-

(a). Para. (8). From a financial point of view, such

work might interfere with the carrying out of the Hung Hom

Bay Scheme,

(b). Para. (5). It being an extension of an existing

promontory, they anticipate that the accentuation of tidal currents caused thereby would hamper shipping at the propos-

ad new quays.

(c). Paras. (6 & 17). Wave-action caused by a strong

N.E. wind particularly during the passage of a typhoon,

would be deflected so as to prejudice the usefulness of wharfage to be constructed at Hung Hom Bay, and in the case of a vertical quay wall being constructed, the face of such a wall would increase sea disturbance in its vicinity.

Objection (a) appears to be due to a misunderstan- ding, as the work undertaken in connection with the construction of quayage at North Point is to be carried out by private enterprise. Furthermore, the two schemes are designed to serve different ends. The Hung Hom Bay Schene to provide facilities for the loading and discharge of vessels from Europe and America The North Point Scheme to make provision for coaster steamers and for lighters which